May 15, 2011, 4th Sunday of Easter

I spent two days at our annual Clergy Conference this last week. The setting was
beautiful for it was at the Oregon Gardens in Silverton. Our speaker was Diana Butler
Bass a church historian. Her books are quite readable. I enjoyed “A People’s History of Christianity”. Her presentation was very good and very timely.

I am motivated to see if I can weave the story we heard from Acts 2 with what is
occurring today in our churches, primarily within the “Institutional Church”. I’m not sure I can pull this off, so we shall see. Note in our reading in Acts the people devoted themselves to the apostles' teachings and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. Verse 46 states that day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home. Fellowship occurred in homes where they listened to and shared the apostles' accounts of the teachings and life of Jesus.

Some background information is needed here. The writing of Acts has been dated
sometime around 85-95 CE. The Roman’s have sacked and pillaged Jerusalem and the
Temple was destroyed. Luke’s account was intended to fill Christians of his day with an unshakable confidence in their future with the story of their beginning. They were a society in great transition.

The Jewish culture and religion were under great stress; there was violence, loss of
bearing and a breakdown in the institution of the Temple. It was dysfunctional because of the influence of Rome. The old Jewish religion which was dependent on the Institutional structure of the Temple no longer existed. Certain people were without jobs, what was a priest to do without a temple? Sacrifices came to a halt. The population was at odds with itself. Those in authority started to look for scapegoats to cast blame.

William McLoughlin writes that following the breakdown come visions of a new
way of being. There are new insights, new understandings of identity and new moral and ethical possibilities. This is precisely what was going on in acts and there are many who say it is what is going on now.

The old Religious Model offered three questions: 1. What do I believe? These are
generally the regulations, the doctrines, creeds and dogmas. 2. How should I behave?
These incorporate the rules, the techniques of worship, the programs the institution has set in motion. And 3. Who Am I? The question is answered by membership in the institution and biology which was either Jewish or Gentile. All of these questions deal with the external.

Something new was emerging, a spirituality that was internal. The questions
changed to 1. How do I believe? (What is my experience with my faith, with whom do I
place my trust, what does it lead me to see as a future) 2. What should I do with my life? This question leads to intentionality and purpose of practice. The people of “The Way” became different from the greater community by the way they helped one another and those in need. 3. Whose am I? Relationship with God and in the risen Christ defined to whom they belonged. They belonged to God by faith, by the presence the Christ and the presence of the Holy Spirit.

It is no secret that the Christian Religion as an institution seems to be broken. There have been numerous polls taken on the church and belief for years. Diana Bass stated that not all questions have been answered honestly. In the Eastern and Southern section of the US actual church attendance does not match the number of people who say they attend church regularly. She did say that Oregonians are at least honest perhaps because we don’t care if mother knows we are not going to church.

There is an interesting movement going on. In 1999 only 6% of the people polled
said they were both religious and spiritual. Religious meant they attended some type of external institutional faith organization and spiritual meant they also have practices that developed inner growth such as meditation, yoga, prayer, labyrinth walks, study groups that focused on being in touch with the Divine. In 2009 48% said they were both Spiritual and Religious. There is a combining of external religious participation and growth in spiritual awareness.

The number of people attending church is down, but the quality of the spiritual
experience with the living Christ is increasing with those who are attending church. The American Institutional Church is in the middle of change. We can lead, do nothing, or go backwards looking for a past experience as an institution or as a congregation.

What are the perceptions that youths between the ages of 16 and 29 have of the
church? If we look at those outside the church we would see that 91% see us as
homophobic, 87% judgmental, 85% hypocritical, 75% too political and militaristic, 72%
see us as out of touch with reality, and 68% say we are boring. These have nothing to do with the teachings of Jesus.

The attitudes of young people who were raised in the church are not so different
80% say we are homophobic, 52% say we are judgmental, 47% hypocritical, 50% too
political, 32% out of touch, and only 27% see us as boring.

Back to the Spiritual awaking in Acts that changed the world. They did not have
programs. They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching which were the teachings of Jesus. They got together to share common meals (potlucks), and they were missional. They reached out to those around them that were in need. They practiced the radical hospitality of Jesus. Many mainline churches, for the most part, are doing this but it is my opinion that the media doesn’t broadcast it because it's boring. They would rather focus on the more outrageous and sensational. Do they ever show what Episcopal Relief and Development does around the world and here in the US?
As long as we, here at Resurrection, know how we believe and experience our
relationship with the Holy Triune God, as long as we know how we are intentional in our faith practice and our purpose for being Christian and to whom we belong, we are moving boldly into the future with the God who makes all things new again. We will be leading the new transformation of the church into a vibrant life that brings the Kingdom of God into reality. It is not about quantity it is about quality. Resurrection is a congregation that enhances the quality of life around you. Continue to see yourselves as the leaders of a renewed vitality in a faith in God and God’s Kingdom on earth.